Skip to content
ICILS 2023 • Student Achievement

Computational Thinking Scores by Country: ICILS 2023

Average computational thinking (CT) scale scores for countries and education systems with published ICILS 2023 results. The international comparison uses the 2023 assessment cycle and the CT scale established for trend measurement in ICILS 2018.

Assessment year: 2023
Unit: CT scale score
Target grade: Grade 8 in most systems
Source: IEA ICILS

ICILS 2023 CT Statistics

Published country means and international summary measures from the IEA computational thinking assessment.

Highest country mean
548
Chinese Taipei
ICILS 2023 average
483
21 eligible non-benchmarking participants
Country mean range
127
548 in Chinese Taipei to 421 in Uruguay
Published CT coverage
22 + 1
22 national participants plus one benchmarking participant
Level 2 or above
66%
ICILS 2023 average student distribution

Average Computational Thinking Scores

Country means for the 21 non-benchmarking participants included in the ICILS 2023 international CT average.

ICILS 2023 CT Scores Across Countries

Average CT scale score, ordered from highest to lowest reported mean

The ICILS 2023 international CT average is 483. The United States and North Rhine-Westphalia are retained in the full table with their reporting-status notes rather than included in this comparison chart.

Chart analysis
  • Chinese Taipei recorded the highest published country mean at 548.
  • Korea, Republic of followed at 537, with the Czech Republic at 527.
  • Twelve of the 21 countries contributing to the international average had point estimates above 483.
  • Italy, at 482, was one scale point below the published ICILS average.
  • Austria and Luxembourg reported the same country mean of 476.
  • The lowest published country mean among participants included in the international average was 421 in Uruguay.
  • The 127-point distance between Chinese Taipei and Uruguay is slightly greater than one international CT standard deviation reported for the 2023 participating-country distribution.
  • Small gaps between country point estimates should not be treated automatically as statistically distinguishable differences.

Full ICILS 2023 Computational Thinking Score Table

All national participants and the benchmarking participant shown in IEA Table 5.5. The source-order distinction for special reporting cases is retained through the coverage-status column.


Country / systemAverage CTYearTarget gradeAverage coverage
Chinese Taipei5482023Grade 8Included
Korea, Republic of5372023Grade 8Included
Czech Republic5272023Grade 8Included
Belgium (Flemish)5092023Grade 8Included
Denmark5042023Grade 8Included
Finland5022023Grade 8Included
France4992023Grade 8Included
Slovak Republic4982023Grade 8Included
Latvia4952023Grade 8Included
Sweden4862023Grade 8Included
Norway4852023Grade 9Included
Portugal4842023Grade 8Included
Italy4822023Grade 8Included
Germany4792023Grade 8Included
Austria4762023Grade 8Included
Luxembourg4762023Grade 8Included
Slovenia4482023Grade 8Included
Malta4382023Grade 8Included
Croatia4292023Grade 8Included
Serbia4222023Grade 8Included
Uruguay4212023Grade 8Included
United States4612023Grade 8Excluded: sampling participation caution
North Rhine-Westphalia (Germany)4612023Grade 8Benchmarking participant
Table analysis
  • The published national point estimates extend from 421 to 548, a range of 127 scale points.
  • Chinese Taipei, Korea, Republic of, and the Czech Republic are the three national participants with means above 520.
  • Denmark, Finland, France, the Slovak Republic, and Latvia fall between 495 and 504.
  • Sweden, Norway, Portugal, Italy, Germany, Austria, and Luxembourg are clustered between 476 and 486.
  • Austria and Luxembourg share the same reported mean of 476.
  • Malta, Croatia, Serbia, and Uruguay have country means within the Level 1 score interval defined for individual achievement, while country means should not be treated as country-level proficiency classifications.
  • The United States score of 461 is reported by IEA with a sampling-participation caution and is not included in the 483 international average.
  • North Rhine-Westphalia is reported as a benchmarking participant rather than as a separate country in the international average.
  • All displayed values are point estimates; sampling uncertainty accompanies the source estimates even when only rounded means are reproduced here.

Assessment Cycle Comparison: 2018 and 2023

CT was introduced as an international option in ICILS 2018. Seven countries have directly comparable country means across the 2018 and 2023 cycles; North Rhine-Westphalia also has comparable benchmark data.

Comparable Country Scores in 2018 and 2023

Average CT scale scores for the seven countries with comparable data in both cycles

The source table reports official cycle differences using unrounded estimates. Displayed rounded means can therefore produce arithmetic differences that differ slightly from the reported change column.

Trend analysis
  • Denmark moved from 527 in 2018 to 504 in 2023; IEA reports a change of -23 points and flags the cycle difference in its statistical comparison.
  • Luxembourg moved from 460 to 476, with an IEA-reported change of +16 points that is also flagged in the source table.
  • Finland moved from 508 to 502 and Germany from 486 to 479; neither cycle difference is flagged by IEA in Table 5.7.
  • France changed from 501 to 499, while Portugal changed from 482 to 484.
  • Korea, Republic of, is shown at 536 in 2018 and 537 in 2023; the official change column reports 0 after calculation from the underlying unrounded estimates.
  • The available CT history consists of assessment cycles rather than an annual time series.

Country / system20182023IEA changeIEA statistical flag
Denmark527504-23Flagged
Finland508502-7Not flagged
France501499-2Not flagged
Germany486479-7Not flagged
Korea, Republic of5365370Not flagged
Luxembourg460476+16Flagged
Portugal482484+2Not flagged
North Rhine-Westphalia (Germany)485461-25Flagged; benchmark
Assessment analysis
  • Comparable national trend coverage is limited to seven countries because CT was an optional ICILS component and 2018 was the first international CT cycle.
  • Luxembourg has the largest positive reported country change in the comparable set at +16 points.
  • Denmark has the largest negative reported country change at -23 points.
  • The North Rhine-Westphalia benchmark shows a reported change of -25 points.
  • IEA flags Denmark, Luxembourg, and North Rhine-Westphalia in the source comparison table; the remaining displayed cycle differences are not flagged.
  • Trend comparisons use CT scale scores. The proficiency-level descriptions introduced for ICILS 2023 should not be substituted for the preliminary 2018 level descriptions when comparing proficiency percentages over time.

ICILS Computational Thinking Proficiency Scale

The 2023 CT achievement scale uses four proficiency levels plus a category below Level 1.


CT levelLower boundaryScore intervalIEA descriptor
Below Level 1Below 330330 or belowBasic interaction
Level 1Above 330>330 to 440Fundamental sequencing
Level 2Above 440>440 to 550Structured problem solving
Level 3Above 550>550 to 660Integrated problem solving
Level 4Above 660>660Systems thinking
Table analysis
  • The CT proficiency boundaries are 330, 440, 550, and 660 scale-score points.
  • The published 2023 country means range from 421 to 548, so the national means themselves lie within the Level 1 or Level 2 score intervals.
  • A country mean located inside a proficiency interval does not mean every student in that country performs at that level.
  • Across the ICILS 2023 average distribution, 37% of students were at Level 2, 23% at Level 3, and 6% at Level 4.
  • The same international distribution placed 34% of students below Level 2.

Score Interpretation and Coverage

Technical points affecting comparisons of the published country means.

2023 international mean

The CT average of 483 is an equally weighted international comparison based on the non-benchmarking participants that met the study’s sampling-participation requirements.

Scale reference

The CT reporting scale was established in ICILS 2018 with an international reference mean of 500 and standard deviation of 100 for the seven participating countries meeting the required sampling conditions in that cycle.

Within-country variation

IEA reports that variation among students within countries is larger than the spread between national means. Country averages therefore summarize only one part of the achievement distribution.

Participation caution

The United States achieved at least 50% overall sampling participation but did not meet the stated participation guideline. Its reported score is retained with that caution and excluded from the ICILS 2023 CT average.

Source and Methodology

Main source International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA), ICILS 2023 International Report, Table 5.5: Country averages and distribution for CT.
Trend source IEA ICILS 2023 International Report, Table 5.7: Changes in average CT achievement since 2018.
Indicator Computational thinking achievement, measuring students’ capacity to formulate real-world problems computationally and develop or evaluate algorithmic solutions that could be carried out with a computer.
Assessment year 2023.
Unit Average CT scale-score points.
Target population Students in the ICILS target grade, normally Grade 8; Norway is reported as Grade 9.
Published coverage 22 national participants plus North Rhine-Westphalia as a benchmarking participant in the CT country table.
International average 483 scale points, based on 21 non-benchmarking participants meeting the sampling-participation requirements.
Missing-data handling Education systems without published internationally comparable CT results are not assigned values and are not inserted into the country table.
Rounding Country means are displayed as whole scale points. Official difference estimates are calculated from underlying values and can differ from subtraction of rounded means.
Trend comparability 2018 and 2023 CT scale scores are directly comparable for the participants listed in Table 5.7. The proficiency-level descriptions used in 2023 replaced the preliminary regions described in 2018.

The full country table reproduces the published IEA point estimates rather than creating a composite score or converting CT results into percentages. The main chart excludes the United States and the benchmarking participant because neither contributes to the reported 483 international average. No values are imputed for non-participating or non-reportable systems.

Methodological Safety Note

ICILS scores are population estimates with sampling uncertainty. Ordering countries by rounded point estimates is not equivalent to proving that every adjacent country differs statistically. The United States carries a sampling-participation caution, North Rhine-Westphalia is a benchmarking participant, and the published CT results apply only to education systems with internationally reportable ICILS 2023 computational thinking data.

📌

Complete guide: Student Achievement